This is where I post, and you can post too!
Was it worth it? Answer.... no
Published on January 24, 2008 By Dan Greene In OS Wars
First let me say I'm not joking when I say I'd love to reply to your posts, but I am seemingly unable to reply only edit the original post, does anybody have any suggestions, I'm using Vista lol and firefox. Is my brower missing the reply functionality?

I purchased an OEM copy of Vista, when I was given the dilemma by Microsoft of either purchasing a OEM XP License for about $10 less than getting an OEM copy of Vista via newegg.

What I can tell you is that I have been a computer user since the 80's and have a history of OS usage, dating back to whatever they called the OS on the Apple IIGS, DOS 5.0, Windows 3.1, Win 95/98/98SE/2000/XP and of course OEM VISTA ULTIMATE 64 bit.

I have finally settled down with Vista, but I am left looking for the new and improved features which really give me the feeling that they are all that (sorta) without the bag of chips.

I don't understand why Vista wasn't packaged as saleable service pack to XP because Vista truly offers an almost immeasurable benefit per dollar over XP.

One of the major downsides of Vista, is the necessity to upgrade hardware on older rigs to achieve performance standards easily obtainable with 2 or 3 or 4 year old hardware on XP. Also, with only 2GB of ram in the sytem, it is smooth, but it would be equally smooth with XP, so while there is intelligent (supposedly) buffering of the RAM by Vista, perhaps reducing the load time on programs you use consistently at certain times of the day, in Vista over XP I don't see that it is a major advantage over XP. I use XP at work daily, Windows 2000 weekly, and Vista at home.

At this point I am pretty comfy with Vista, I have totally disabled the UAC, and I am left to wonder if I am really safer with Vista vs XP. I did have a virus or nasty bit of malware at one time, with Vista, which I was able to safely dispose of using System Restore. On my old single core rig, System Restore no longer works for unknown reasoning, also I cannot reformat the drive, and install a clean OS, because I no longer have the activation code which I'll have to call up Dell TSupport and spend more hours of my life than it is worth to deal with that, while having a protected computer readily available should there be a problem.

However, with Vista Ultimate, no update to the speech recognition system, no word processor which interfaces with the speech recognition, and no real surviving feature that I get excited by.

At this point I would have preferred to get OEM XP and a cheap or bootleg copy of Office, just for the fact that I have spell check and compatibility with work computers, Excel files.

There are a few visual things but nothing to justify 5 years of development, nothing to justify the price, and certainly nothing to want me to invest any money in upcoming Windows 7 or go Microsoft in the future. Unfortunately they have damaged their company image, going from the evil almost monopoly to the exploiter of that power to release drab OS software that lacks completeness and robustness.

There is nothing that truly bothers me about Vista Ultimate, if you forget about, No MS WORD, No OS integrated Microsoft Virus Protection, and lack of incompatibility of the Vista Speech Recognition Engine with Open Office.

I believe that Vista, really does deserve the half assed product award. At this point.



How does one make a reply in ones' own post? JU must have changed since I was last here since I can no longer reply to users in the forum which is kinda stupid in my opinion.

Comments (Page 9)
9 PagesFirst 7 8 9 
on Mar 02, 2008
and I found out today that in addition to 2008 Server and 2008 Visio, if you complete an evaluation at the event you get a free copy of Vista Ultimate. Wooooooot!!!! So I get another coffee mug coaster.............

Plus a 1GB Microsoft Office Flash Drive.........

And more goodies..........***drooooools***  

These boyz at Microsoft at generous    
on Mar 03, 2008
and I found out today that in addition to 2008 Server and 2008 Visio, if you complete an evaluation at the event you get a free copy of Vista Ultimate. Wooooooot!!!!


Plus a 1GB Microsoft Office Flash Drive........


And more goodies..........*


Yup, those boyz at MS are generous, alright.... giving all that stuff away, and geez I'm jealous you USians get a free lunch plus software/OSes to boot. It just positively stinks that MS is stiffing Aussies $200 pp before they get in the door.... and the cheese and wine 'll probably be (repackaged/re-bottled) left-overs from some US function.

It just not bloody right ***droooools*** that you ***droools*** get lunch, ***droools*** PC goodies ***droooools*** and wine ***drooools**** to wash it all down with/get a bit piddly.

Oh well, good luck to you.... and please think of me ***drooooling*** every now and then while you're playing with a that luvverly software.
on Apr 09, 2008
Well have you guys and gals heard of the windows vista drm scheme ??
Well microsoft havent turned it on yet( in 2010 according to the wiki) and even the system requires that ALL Graphics cards be "signed" by microsoft for the computer to work (what the hell is with that)
well this info came from the wikipedia(WWW Link)
Digital rights management
Another common criticism concerns the integration of new forms of digital rights management into the operating system, specifically the introduction of the Protected Video Path. This architecture is designed such that "premium content" from HD DVD or Blu-ray discs may mandate that the connections between PC components be encrypted. Devices such as graphic cards must be approved by Microsoft. Depending on what the content demands, the devices may not pass premium content over non-encrypted outputs, or they must artificially degrade the quality of the signal on such outputs or not display it all. There is also a revocation mechanism that allows Microsoft to disable drivers of compromised devices in end-user PCs over the Internet.[78] Peter Gutmann, security researcher and author of the open source cryptlib library, claims that these mechanisms violate fundamental rights of the user (such as fair use) , unnecessarily increase the cost of hardware, and make systems less reliable, (the "tilt bit" is a particular worry; if triggered, the entire graphic subsystem performs a reset) and vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks.[79] Proponents have claimed that Microsoft had no choice but to follow the demands of the movie studios, and that the technology will not actually be enabled until after 2010;[80][81] Microsoft also noted that content protection mechanisms have existed in Windows as far back as Windows Me, and that the new protections will not apply to any existing content (only future content).
on Apr 09, 2008
I wouldn't trust everything read on Wiki, anyone can come along and magiclly change it. Hell I could edit it right now and make it say that January 1st 2009 everyone using Windows Vista will have a mandatory upgrade that involves a payment to Microsoft of $100 in order to regain access to your computer.
Anyone can come along and put whatever they want in there, I would like to see more light shed on this though, if it's true.
on Apr 09, 2008
I'm thinking BS on that one. MS plan to have Windows 7 out by 2010 in any case.
9 PagesFirst 7 8 9